patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Wilmette Parent: Proposed Referendum is 'a Reasonable Price to Pay'

Resident Stuart McDermott explains why he is pro-referendum.

 

The following is a letter from Wilmette resident and parent Stuart McDermott. McDermott has three kids in Dist. 39 schools, including two at McKenzie Elementary School and one in a pre-school program at Romona. He has also helped work with the pro-referendum organization Citizens for Wilmette Schools. 

I am writing to ask the good citizens of Wilmette to support the District 39 School Referendum. Voting “Yes” in favor of this referendum is essential if we want to maintain the quality of education for the children that go to public school in District 39 in Wilmette. If the referendum is voted down, however, this will result in severe cuts to current educational levels. Among other things, 24 percent of teachers will be cut; class sizes will balloon, and average class sizes across grade K-8 will be 27 students/teacher. This number (27), will be +50 percent higher than the average class size (18) of the other “feeder schools” that send their children to New Trier High School. It will even be +25 percent higher than the average class size for schools across the state of Illinois. Numerous programs will be curtailed or abolished entirely, including all reading intervention and all foreign language programs. All librarians will be cut, as will all differentiation/gifted specialists. Basic classes for physical education, music and art, will all be cut back dramatically, by 30 to 50 percent.

If the referendum passes, our property taxes will go up by $58.80 for every $1,000 we currently pay. Let’s be clear, I don’t enjoy paying higher taxes, and I don’t know of many people who do enjoy paying more. If this referendum passes, this is what a Wilmette resident can expect to pay in additional taxes:

 

Property taxes

Tax increase

Tax Increase/week

$1,000

$58.80

$1.13

$5,000

$294.00

$5.65

$10,000

$588.00

$11.31

$15,000

$882.00

$16.96

$20,000

$1,176.00

$22.62

 

Most of us probably pay $10,000-$20,000/year in property taxes, so the added tax burden will be about $10-20/week. This would seem like a reasonable price to pay to ensure that we don’t have the severe budget cuts mentioned above.  It would also seem to be an affordable amount for almost all of us who live here.

There are many reasons to be in favor of the Referendum. From purely self-interested reasons, anyone with children attending our schools wants the education levels to be maintained at the current standards. But all homeowners should care, because maintaining the current education levels are also important for our property values. Don’t take my word on this, just ask any realtor who sells homes in this area. Or ask my wife, who gives tours of McKenzie Elementary School to prospective homeowners. Quality of schools is one of the most important, if not the most important reason why people move to Wilmette. Our property values benefit substantially from the fact that the public schools here are of such high caliber. If our schools start to weaken, prospective homeowners will look elsewhere to raise their families, and our property values will suffer. Besides self-interested reasons, on an altruistic basis, it also makes sense to support public education for the children of our community.   

Finally, some might argue that District 39 needs to control spending better, rather than increase taxes via a referendum. But an objective analysis of the facts suggests that District 39 is already quite frugal regarding expenses. Some facts:

Prior to putting forth this referendum, District 39 already slashed its operating budget by almost (10 percent);

District 39 teachers’ pay is hardly excessive: Of fifteen nearby area school districts, our teachers’ salaries are third lowest, and are (9 percent) below the area average (and this is after the most recent contract in 2008).  In fact, District 39 teacher salaries are the lowest relative to any of the other New Trier feeder school districts;

District 39 is efficient in educating its students, and not wasteful: On an operating cost per student, District 39’s costs are $13,060/student. This is third lowest among 15 area school districts, and it is (32 percent) below all of the other New Trier feeder school districts (their average spend/pupil is $17,300); 

Despite being at or near the bottom in terms of teacher salaries and operating costs/pupil (relative to these other schools), District 39 compares favorably with strong test scores (ISATs) and high independent rankings (such as the recent Chicago Magazine rankings and Blue Ribbon Awards).

Considering these facts, it would seem that District 39 has to date controlled its spending well.  These numerous expense metrics, coupled with District 39’s quantitative results (test scores), suggest that District 39 has been one of the most cost effective, if not the most cost effective school district in the area.

Investing in education is one of the most important things we can do for children.  It is for the above reasons that I am voting “Yes” in favor of the referendum on April 5. I would respectfully ask that the residents of Wilmette also vote in favor of this important referendum.

About this column: A place for correspondence between Patch and You. Related Topics: Blue Ribbon, Chicago Magazine, and Referendum
What do you think of the proposed Dist. 39 referendum? Tell us in the comments.

Melissa Hirschel

10:20 pm on Sunday, March 6, 2011

I agree 100% with this article. I am a D39 alum and I moved back here as well for the schools. If this doesn't pass, not only will our property suffer but our kids' educational career will suffer for sure and will affect them forever. We owe it to our kids and to our community.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Max

6:06 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

NO.

Strongly disagree with you and the author. This Tax Increase is neither affordable nor necessary.

Look around EVERWHERE in the US. Many, if not most, municipalities are in fiscal trouble and the answer for these municipalities is to learn to live within the means NOT RAISE TAXES.

Vote NO to this ill-advised Tax Increase Referendum just as the 174 mil proposal was DEFEATED.

They just don't get the message.

Vote NO to the Tax Increase.

Comment_arrow

Daphne

2:26 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

The Fact is that all of our surrounding communities have passed one or two referendums in the last 13 years, in order to maintain the excellence of their schools. "Living within our means" as Max suggests would result in a notably inferior school system, and to suggest that homebuyers would choose to overlook that issue to save a few hundred dollars in taxes only demonstrates a lack of understanding of the local real estate market. We are not everywhere in the US, we are a very wealthy community with very high standards. For now.

Margaret Mcintyre

12:57 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

District 39 is "slashing" non-special education expenses.
As a former school board member that served during the time when the District prepared to leave the NSSED buy hiring over 40 employees (2002-2005) for the sole purpose of providing comprehensive special education services without the help of the NSSED--I understand how the District got into this unsustainable budget situation. Board members and then Special Education Head, Ray Lechner argued that the district would save money--the tuition paid to the NSSED--if Wilmette went it alone and provided all of those services within the District. The fact that Wilmette is by far the largest of the New Trier feeder schools and disportionate user of the NSSED services seemed to support that argument at the time. Instead, the budget has increasingly grown to support special education and now music, art, technology and "gifted" curriculum differentiation dollars are being threatened with cuts but not a word about the huge number of staff dedicated to special education. A full audit of all resources dedicated to special education must be done. Also, test scores were higher prior to leaving the NSSED (circa 1997).
Finally, the argument that Wilmette has the lowest per pupil cost of any of the New Trier feeder districts is a direct result of the much larger number of students in Wilmette and the economies of scale--spreading the total costs over a much larger number of students.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

12:58 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

Finally, Wilmette schools are good, but a large proportion of parents provide supplemental education over the range of abilities--from special education to gifted programs offered on the North Shore. The parental dollars spent on tutoring and supplemental education guarantee test scores stay high. CRC studies in the late 90's surveyed parents and found approximately 45%--50% of parents had provided math or reading 'supplemental education" by 8th grade.

Comment_arrow

Carl

8:13 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011

I have been reading these posts for a while, and I too find it interesting that Ms. McIntyre is spending so much time and energy on a town that is hundreds of miles from where she lives. Then I found the answer - on Facebook. Ms McIntyre writes to Senator Kirk:

"Margaret Mcintyre-Farina Out here in Norfolk, we are still cheering for you! Hopefully, after you are elected, IL will come back, and we can afford to move back to Wilmette! November will be a tide turner!"

Now I get it. Ms. McIntyre wants to live in Wilmette, but she can't afford it. So now she is trying to drive down Wilmette real estate prices by scuttling our school referendum.

As a former school board member, she knows that 50-75% of all home buyers in Wilmette have school age children. They move here for the schools. She also knows that if she destroys our school system, she will drive 50-75% of the potential home buyers away from Wilmette and thereby cause our home values to decline.

Presto - now Ms. McIntyre can afford to move back to Wilmette.

Margaret, please stop. This is disappointing behavior to say the least.

Margaret Mcintyre

1:17 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

Stuart,
What your analysis fails to include, is that in addition to the $500 to $1000 per year increase in property taxes is the "discount" effect on your home value that is unrelated to school performance. As taxes consume a larger share of the monthly payment, home prices will be depressed and equity will accrue at a slower rate. Ask realtors why homes in Evanston have historically been lower priced than homes in Wilmette. The simple fact is, household income is not increasing and there is a ceiling on the prices of homes in Wilmette. Home values have declined from 25 to 30% - unprecedented on the NorthShore. At best, Northshore residents can hope for price stabilization and and slowing of home foreclosures. If every child that attended McKenzie was accepted to Harvard--or even University of Illinois, the price of a McKenzie home simply would not go up. The glory days of the 90s are over. Wilmette residents should be strategizing on how to return to the frugal reputation of Wilmette in the 60's, 70's and early 80's. Wilmette should be looking ahead to the near future when the New Trier districts are consolidated and the cost per pupil differential will evaporate. I recommend that Ray Lechner devise a three year plan to reduce in District special education and return to the more cost effective NSSED consortium--like the other New Trier feeder schools.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kimbra

9:29 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

I am no expert on what I'm going to share, but I've learned recently that a number of school districts are pulling out of NSSED. I believe New Trier made this same choice a number of years ago, and I believe that D39 was ahead of the game when they chose this route of servicing our students. Coming from a family full of teachers and formerly teaching in a school district that used NSSED 15 years ago, I can say I think D39 made the right move. I am nothing short of impressed of the staff and services D39 provides IN ALL of its programs -- not just special education. I think we should all stay tuned to see the future of these Co-op programs. And in the meantime, I see wonderful returns on a very strategic decision D39 made - both financially and for our children's learning experience. Have you had the opportunity to volunteer in any of our schools? When I volunteer to serve lunch, help in a classroom, or supervise young gardeners, I always drive away feeling I was the lucky one -- to be a part of such a caring, well-balanced, thoughtful, and respectable community within our 'school walls'. Thank you, D39!

Margaret Mcintyre

10:54 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

Kimbra, my three kids also had wonderful experiences at McKenzie- during the 90’s.
However, unlimited special education expenditures lure families with special needs to the district. The huge expense of special education has inflated the District budget. An FOI request could reveal what percentage other New Trier feeder districts who are NSSED members spend on special education. Possibly, the reason their per pupil expenditures are higher than Wilmette's is partly because they can’t control NSSED's costs. Threatening to withdraw is a negotiating strategy to counter the NEA power and recent new contract. According to the NSSED web site, New Trier is still a member. http://www.nssed.org/Pages/Districts.aspx
There are two major costs to Wilmette’s full inclusion "stand-a-lone" model of special education -- sheer numbers of specialized personnel hired and compensated (all more expensive than a regular classroom teacher) and curriculum modifications that are implemented which do not challenge or benefit regular Ed or academically accelerated students. Add to per pupil costs, the money parents pay or tutors. The McKenzie teachers did a yeoman's job at balancing the needs of all students--but over the years, more and more IEP's resulted in burgeoning costs driven by fewer students per teacher. I believe direct compensation to parents from the Federal Government as vouchers for tuition and elimination of the teachers union is the ultimate solution to this conundrum.

Reply

Denise Kellar

11:10 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

I am a Realtor, and a parent of a Special Education graduate of Wilmette schools as well as New Trier.

First, the 25-30% downturn in home values is due to the economy, not due to one community vs. another or one tax structure vs. another.

Second, Special Education: We moved to Wilmette for the Special Education services. We checked out the surrounding communities, Glenview, Northbrook and made phone calls to Winnetka and Kenilworth. Wilmette was head and shoulders above the others! Without question. If the options were just NSSED, I probably would have not been as happy. Nothing against NSSED/NSSRA. It's an option. As a parent of the "Graduate" Special Olympics Program with a 29 year-old child still participating, thanks to a really great caring, Lew Goldstein, I have seen tremendous strides in my adult child, and all of her fellow Olympians. It's simply amazing to have witnessed this growth. Thanks to Wilmette District 39 and New Trier. I'm sure many people would share this opinion with me. I sell these communities based on "schools"--that's the reason we're all here, usually. Our schools are vital and contribute a lot to what drives our real estate market.

Winnetka passed a huge referendum within the last 10 years to update the crumbling infrastructure of all their schools; a bitter pill to swallow vs. what Wilmette is facing now. Wilmette, please wake up and find that balance because it's a fabulous community and an incredible place to live.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

11:53 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

Denise, there are two factors in home prices--the recent burst of the real estate bubble which is not a mere cyclical downturn. Secondly, Evanston has historically had lower home prices because Evanston has always had higher taxes than Wilmette--it's a fact. I hope you offer the same level of compassion to sellers who are losing their home to foreclosure as you expect from the community with regards to paying for your child's special education. It has been tragic for many people on the NorthShore to lose their jobs and then lose their homes. Many people are barely hanging on and one more tax increase will force them to sell their home.
But then again, many of these homes are bargains to be had by people with special education needs shopping for a "wealthy" school district. Perhaps there should be a residency requirement that does not reward "shopping" the district. Only children born while their parents are home owners in Wilmette can use special education services.

Kimbra

11:46 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

Margaret, have you had the opportunity to hear Dr. Lechner speak on the history and current issues that face Wilmette D39 in this referendum vote? If not and you wish to, I can supply you with a location and time for you to attend a short presentation followed by dynamic Q & A and community discussion. It's a great place for Dr. Lechner and others to hear your view.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

12:20 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Kimbra,

I served on the school board with Dr. Lechner and I understand the dynamics of Special Education costs. While I have great respect for Dr. Lechner--in fact I think he's the best Superientendent Wilmette had in my 25 years of residence in Wilmette; but the reality is the community must share the pain of cutting costs as home prices continue to decline and Illinois goes bankrupt which Wilmette cannot shelter itself from. The subsidy for special education teachers which Wilmette hired in abundance over the 2002-2005 period has been cut by the state of IL. Dr. Lechner's passion is Special Education and he is the most knowledgeable professional on special education besides the head of NSSED himself. None the less, these galloping special education costs stand in the way of a fair distribution of a shrinking pool of educational dollars. The drive to preserve the level of Special Education services threatens to depress home prices by insisting that full inclusion and comprehensive--unlimited special education be provided within Wilmette. The NSSED meets the legal requirements to provide the least restrictive environment for special needs. Personally, I think the biggest tragedy here is the NEA WEA refusing to reopen the contract to freeze salaries. The NEA backed teachers at NSSED just renegotiated a VERY generous contract. View all teacher and administrator salaries of New Trier feeder district schools here--http://www.familytaxpayers.org/salary.php

Margaret Mcintyre

11:57 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

Denise, you confirmed what drives the costs of Wilmette schools--not the benefit to the majority of students --or higher test scores, but the huge amount of money that goes to educating special needs students such as yours--to the level of quality that you enjoy because you "shopped" Wilmette instead of one of the other New Trier Feeder schools. But do you really expect other parents and people without children in the schools to risk their home values with higher taxes that translate into lower prices and less equity--to finance your child's special education at a premium private school level? One could argue, that a high earning real estate professional could and should pay for a private school or special education services for their child. I suppose, as a real estate professional, you could offer home sellers your pledge to find them a buyer who has a special needs child who will eagerly pay a premium price for their home--expecting to get much more "value" back in school services than they themselves pay in taxes thanks to neighbors who subsidize them through higher taxes and possibly a lower sales price for their own home if the economy continues to decline and they must sell quickly to avoid foreclosure etc. This arrangement does not make a "generous community"--in reality, it fosters resentment and litigation. I commend NSSED for establishing a Foundation where people willingly support special education instead of being extorted and punished with ruinous taxes.

Reply

Rick Percifield

2:51 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

I am sorry to say I will be voting "no" on the referendum. Average teacher's pay in District 39 is $65M per year, with a lot of time off. Their contract gives them 5.5% annual increases, but they will not agree to any concessions at all. I am happy to agree to increase my taxes, but this needs to be a two way street. Their negotiating strategy is all or nothing.

Reply

Kimbra

3:13 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

I'm sorry to hear that, Rick. I, on the other hand, will be voting YES. I'm so glad our teachers finally have a good contract that for once is keeping teachers in our district and attracting teachers to it, as well. Being behind 12 other neighboring school districts in average teacher salary (Avoca, Kenilworth, Glencoe, Winnetka, Golf, Niles, Northbrook, Sunset Ridge, Lindolnwood, Glenview, etc. are all ahead of us) I respect their current contract and think it's fair. We are no longer the 'revolving door' district. I also would not have expected teachers to make concessions for our schools - it's up to us to take care of our community. No matter how one feels about the teacher contracts, please be sure you have accurate ininformation on all school programs that will be reduced or cut entirely. Remember, it's our children who will feel this impact.

Reply

Kimbra

3:27 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Margaret, I think I heard you've been living in VA for awhile now? If you are still a Wilmette resident, please do come hear Dr. Lechner speak. I applaud the number of people who have either been undecided or leaning towards 'no' who have showed up, heard him speak, asked their questions and are thrilled to understand the details of the referendum. We all have questions and it's really necessary to go to the source of the facts before we make any decisions on how we'll vote April 5th.

Reply

Margaret Mcintyre

4:50 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Yes Kimbra, we regularly reconsider where we want to live over the next 5 years and beyond. I am a University of Illinois graduate and it breaks my heart to see my old University going down in scandal and budget cuts. My kids will probably end up going to U VA--out of reach of most New Trier kids--even among the most talented. Wilmette schools are much more comfortably positioned at this time than other Illinois schools in less wealthy districts. But the wealth is evaporating. While you are focused on special education and whether to opt out of NSSED, the bigger picture crisis looming all around you--with the governor exploring how to consolidate school districts. Jeff Schoenberg is involved which makes me think he knows it's going to happen and he wants to be nearby to influence it. Illinois has BIG problems and the teachers are myopically focused on not making any concessions--as Rick Percifield observed. I am in Wilmette frequently and I do explore issues in depth (and from the inside track). What happens with taxes and public sector pensions will make all the difference if and when we move back. I predict, if this referendum goes through, home values will continue to slide, homes will be on the market longer and increasing taxes will accelerate a downward spiral in real estate. Sure, young families with special needs children may move into "bargain" priced homes--but where will this all end? How much real estate decline can the District and Illinois sustain?

Reply

John Nash

4:50 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

I am voting yes. I agree with everything that Stuart says and all of his reasons to vote for it. The programs are necessary for our kids education, and property values will be hurt if the referendum does not pass since our schools will then be inferior to competing districts. If it pases, our taxes will still be lower than many competing districts and equivalent to others. Right now our tax rate is one of the lowest among the New Trier sender districts. No one likes paying more taxes, but the alternative in this case is much worse and there will be an oversized impact on property values. Margaret your facts are wrong on NSSED. I have discussed this extensively with people at the district that know the costs. It is indisputable that pulling out of NSSED saved money and that going back would cost the district more money that it spends on special education right now. Blaming district 39 Special education for the referendum is nonsense. Special edustion costs have been going down. We spend less per pupil than the other districts and it is not economy of scale--it is smart spending, such as, pulling out of NSSED. School spending is always measured per pupil that is the only intelligent way to compare districts. Each child requires teachers, building space, supplies, admin support. It is the only reasonable metric to use and District 39 has spent efficiently in special education, and elsewhere. Do you still live in Dist 39 Margaret?

Reply

Kimbra

5:13 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Margaret, thank you for the concern for Wilmette. We are all concerned about so many issues. While some things may be out of my control I do know I can vote YES on April 5th. Much luck to you and your family as you choose an educational path for your family. Best to you.

Reply

Margaret Mcintyre

5:23 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

John, no, I am no longer a tax payer in Wilmette, but I do in fact have all the numbers, documents and facts related to the Wilmette District's hiring spree during 2002-2005. John, you are a realtor who depends on sustaining the illusion that there is a discernible difference between Winnetka schools and Wilmette schools for example. The problem with being a special education Mecca is people shop the district as Denise Kellar--another Realtor admits in her post above--at least she's honest. I can imagine you sell the value of our in-district special education programs too. I lived in Wilmette longer than you have John and in the early 80s' Wilmette was a more cost conscious town. I understand you're from New York --the most over priced real estate in the world aside from Bahrain. Here in Virginia, when folks move from New York to the warm climate, they offer top dollar (and over pay) regularly because prices just seem so much less than in New York. I'm sure Wilmette seems like a bargain to you. (Weren't you for the failed New Trier Referendum?
As I predict, home values will continue to fall as you continue to crank up the taxes. At least the taxes are still deductible.

Reply

John Nash

5:56 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Sorry Margaret you are wrong again, except for my years in grad school and the Army--I have lived in Wilmette since 1964. This is my last comment.

Reply

Margaret Mcintyre

6:07 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

John, my apologies. I did have you confused with another realtor who posts on Trulia regularly.
From you resume, I see you are a Veteran and an attorney who has worked in Real Estate in the established business of your dad. You have surely seen the changes on the North Shore. It is rare to meet a military veteran on the North Shore. Again, my apologies. ( I do have many of the documents including the personnel reports from the years just prior to joining the NSSED, as well as the teacher contracts etc.)

Reply

Wilmette Empty Nester

11:22 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Margaret, you seem to need to apologize for a lot more than that. I believe in our schools and as a long time resident I am really sick to my stomach at how you are attacking a school district for trying to help children, special needs or not. We are a community, filled with residents who care about all of our children and want the best for them, even if our own have moved out of the area. I cannot believe that you can sit there and say that the way our schools were in the 80's and 90's is what we should aspire for. It is obvious you have your own personal gripe with either the Wilmette community as a whole, or special education. As far as the money needed to fund the greatest asset to our community,our schools, the fact that you believe that a $600 per year tax increase will be the reason someone is foreclosed on is a scare tactic that I do not appreciate. I really hope you can focus your time and energy in more constructive ways. I may not be as articulate as you but I do know one thing. You seem to have a lot of opinions on our community, what we have done wrong, and what we should be doing, and you don't even live here. Shame on you!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

11:17 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Dear Empty Nester--opinions yes, personal gripes--no.
This entire discussion has confirmed that our move was timely--a blessing from God. Do you realize we sold our home at the top of the market and the family that bought it, through their unfortunate personal circumstances had to sell 9 mos. later, after the crash of 2008 and they lost $140, 000. Their taxes went up $2000 for the year they lived there. Me bitter--you've got to be kidding. I've also learned there is life after Wilmette and we are enjoying the culture and historical richness of Virginia. It's like our family has been given a second life--a diverse and sophisticated community where the arts flourish, the beach and waterfronts are minutes away, Williamsburg and the college of William and Mary are a short drive and my daughter has as many friends, a position in the Governor's school Music Program and the pre-med science track! I learned that talent is recognized and nurtured in many places besides Wilmette ( I was worried about that when we moved.) My middle son plays varsity football and rows for his high school--and is flourishing academically. My oldest child will graduate from U Va--which costs less than funding starved U of I. What is happening in Illinois is heartbreaking and many friends are now trapped in Wilmette with devalued homes and shrinking retirement savings. Tax increases will accelerate the liquidation of nest eggs and force them to sell at a loss. WE are THANKFUL, not regretful.

Kelly Rudnicki

10:08 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Thank you so much Empty Nester, because I could have written exactly the same thing. As a parent of four special needs children I am incensed and offended by Margaret's reckless comments. But, since she doesn't have a say in our April 5th referendum, it doesn't matter much what her opinion is regarding the state of our schools and community. And thank you to Stu, Kimbra and John for taking the high road in trying to educate and raise awareness.

Reply

Abby Reger

10:14 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Wow. Never in a million years did I think I'd wind up regretting the fact that my husband and I spent over 6 years paying property taxes in Wilmette before our oldest child started Kindergarten in Wilmette. The unoriginal rhetoric criticizing the teacher's union and demeaning special education isn't germane to the referendum and is nothing short of angry vitriol. When I moved here I was of the understanding that our community possessed a strong obligation to maintain it's schools and to make sure that every student has the same opportunities, amenities and access as the previous generation. I can see I was was mistaken and am so disappointed in my so-called neighbors whether they live out of state or right next door.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

10:36 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Abby, I understand the emotions of disappointment.
I was offended and deeply disappointed by the WEA and NEA as they use "the children" as pawns in a reckless and self-serving claim to tax payer's nest eggs.

Chanin closed his nearly 25-minute speech by explaining the influence of the NEA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-piPkgAUo0w
“Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.
And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year, because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.”

Margaret Mcintyre

10:33 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Reckless? Vitriol?
The WEA is an affiliate of the NEA and is directed by uniserve representatives in negotiations.
Take a look at what the union is saying about children--how much they care--

Chanin closed his nearly 25-minute speech by explaining the influence of the NEA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-piPkgAUo0w
“Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.
And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year, because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.”

Reply

Abby Reger

10:54 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Peg despite your need to have the last word, I stand behind my remarks. I am proud to live in a district that serves kids with special needs kids so well. Furthermore I refuse to lump this district's union in with other teacher's unions from different districts around the country.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

11:56 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Article XIII-Affiliation with the National Education Association
Section 1.
The WEA ratifies the Charter and the NEA Constitution and Bylaws, declares its relation to the NEA as an affiliated state association, and pledges its active assistance and support in promoting the program outlined by the NEA in the fulfillment of its purposes and objectives.
http://www.washingtonea.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=101&Itemid=54

Save Wilmette Schools

12:42 am on Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Congratulations on your daughter's position in the Governor's Music Program! I wonder if any of Wilmette's students will be lucky enough to be a part of such a program. Not likely if music programs are cut and they never get a chance to pick up an instrument. Margaret, it is truly sad that you believe your children were deserving of all of these programs but when it comes to ours you try and wreak havoc. I believe a large part of your children's successes came because of OUR school system, so instead of spewing hatred and throwing out all these statistics that you spin for your benefit, you should be praising the educators, administrators, and the community who helped your children succeed. It is so ironic to me that your family benefitted from the passing of the 1998 referendum but now here you are writing from over 1000 miles away to criticize us. As for your comment about "life after Wilmette", I think it's about time you start living it!

Reply

Momfia04

12:47 am on Wednesday, March 9, 2011

I have been reading articles and viewing comments on the upcoming D39 referendum to learn the views and opinions of people in MY community. While I understand that others (who do not have a vote - and are apparently SO HAPPY they left Wilmette behind, they cannot let one comment go by without a response) can voice their opinions, I am finding these rantings to be tiresome. In my opinion - the more you write (and I have not doubt you will) the more people can see your level of crazy... Now, if there are people within the community who have something to say either pro or con - I'd love to read that!

Reply

Denise Kellar

1:08 am on Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Margaret,
I think we're all better off that your family moved to VA or W VA since you speak so highly of all the benefits of living there and how well and impressive your children are doing with their new schools and accomplishments; maybe they are doing so well because they had their start in D39 Wilmette Schools! Glad for all your knowledge and stats on D39; perhaps all that was then and "this" is now.
Re my "shopped"--well, when you find your child is ready for the next step, what parent wouldn't explore options for their child, that's what being a parent is all about right? 30 years ago, special education was entirely different than it is today; thankfully, because intervention at an earlier age is now the norm and tremendous strides have been achieved for all. Perhaps your view, is to place those in need, still in the back of the classroom and stick them inside their home after school ends with only their parents.
Figuring out real estate values over the last 3 years has been extremely hard for all concerned, and that includes me, the professional. Luckily, I didn't have to deliver "bad" news to my clients, because I helped put them in good, solid homes, because I'm brutally honest & a caring professional for 18 yrs. There were less than 50 (approx 30-35 from memory) foreclosures/short sales in Wilmette in 2010, hardly the majority. I have had to help sellers through this storm making "genuine" caring, tough decisions with and for them; not my earning power.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

9:31 am on Thursday, March 10, 2011

Denise, did you lower your commission "to help your clients throught the storm" or charge then the standard 5%?

community activist

10:24 pm on Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Our best revenge is winning on April 5th , let's put our time and energy into talking to people who are reasonable and thoughtful and not get bogged down with the crazy rants of someone who doesn't even have a vote! Visit the website www.SupportWilmetteSchools.com to volunteer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

9:00 am on Thursday, March 10, 2011

community activist: If you have courage of your convictions, you will post with your name. Instead of anonymously spewing venom , you could help your District's pitiful situation by getting informed instead of just getting mad.

Margaret Mcintyre

8:51 am on Thursday, March 10, 2011

Gentle readers, revenge, rage, and jealousy are not very attractive motivations, especially for cultivated and sophisticated Wilmette mothers. You are attacking the messenger here. Your real enemy is the NEA controlled WEA. The union doesn’t care about your kids. See their true motivations and values in the video below from their 2010 convention (a Wilmette teacher, possibly on paid leave was there.) The reason my kids are better off in Virginia is because Virginia is a non-union state—where there are actually JOBS AND high performing schools! It gets better-- we have choice among magnate schools differentiated by curriculum—a pre-medical & engineering, an international baccalaureate, or music and the performing arts. Instead of two “middle schools”, we have magnates within neighborhood gr. 6-8 junior high schools which award high school credit (to the accelerated students) for foreign language, math and science. Classes of accelerated students are larger than classes including special ed students. Any child can get tutoring after school from one of the department teachers who rotate tutoring duty. How do we afford this? Virginia isn’t controlled by the NEA.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

8:51 am on Thursday, March 10, 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-piPkgAUo0w
“Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.
And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year, because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.”

Margaret Mcintyre

8:52 am on Thursday, March 10, 2011

I once clung to the idea that more money for the schools and higher pay for teachers translated into higher achievement –but I was proven wrong when we moved to Virginia. Virginia ranks 13 in achievement, Illinois is down the list at 32.
http://www.edreform.com/_upload/cer_state_scorecard.pdf

The ISAT curriculum grade fell from 2005 to 2010: English standards from B to D.
Compared to Virginia’s B to B+. Math standards in IL fell from a C to D. Only Massachusetts had A’s in all categories and approved Singapore Math state-wide.
http://edexcellencemedia.net/publications/2010/201007_state_education_standards_common_standards/SOSSandCC2010_FullReportFINAL.pdf

The TeacherPortal.com survey shows Illinois is No. 1 in the site's salary comfort index rankings. Illinois also offers a special education tuition waiver program--a teacher pursuing a career in special education can qualify for full tuition exemptions at eligible institutions for up to four years.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/05/21/best-states-for-teachers-personal-finance-teachers.html
You will see in 2010 Wilmette has teachers earning over $100,000. A PE teacher at $102, 719. Curriculum Differentiation teacher: $111,609. McKenzie teacher: $109,059. Central School librarian: $112,177.
http://www.familytaxpayers.org/salary.php

Reply
Comment_arrow

WilmetteCitizen

5:11 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

Margaret or is your name Peg? Please take your sour grapes and have them in Virginia where you live. We are a community that cares about facts, civil discourse,research and moderation. I can see why you couldn't live here.

Greenwood

8:51 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

Wilmette Citizen has a good point. We are a community that cares about facts, civil discourse, research and moderation. Unfortunately, none of those community members seem to be posting to this thread.

Reply

WilmetteCitizen

8:58 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

No one wants to give Ms Virginia the time of day and other community members are busy discussing this very real challenge together face to face with their neighbors and families

Reply

Greenwood

12:11 am on Friday, March 11, 2011

We should give "Ms. Virginia" the time of day. While everyone else cries "get informed!" she is providing backup for her statements, rather than just threatening "revenge," or calling someone with an opposing viewpoint "crazy." I am on the fence, and I am reviewing a thread between a former school board member who has moved out of the district and folks that are very, yet perhaps blindly, proud of D39. I''ve had a generally good experience with our schools, but before I cast my vote I want information. Let's get informed.

Denise, you have a special education child, and you clearly researched communities before you settled on Wilmette and D39. How did D39's special education services differ from the other communities you investigated? Do families with special education students pay any additional fees? Are those fees based on the additional services that the child might require, such as a parapro? Did other districts charge fees for additional special ed services? I'm not being confrontational; I simply don't know.

I'll admit that I don't attend every school board meeting. Before I vote on the referendum, I want to know where the information is coming from - please, guys, let me know your sources.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Walter

6:55 pm on Saturday, March 26, 2011

I get my information from District 39. The website is http://www.wilmette39.org. From the banner menu, click "News" and then "Referendum Information." There is great stuff there, including a referendum fact sheet. I tried to cut-and-paste it, but it is twice as long as the comment feature will allow here.

WilmetteCares

8:55 am on Friday, March 11, 2011

Parents of children with special ed services in public schools do not pay extra for those services. Likewise, children who get reading intervention, differentiation, gifted or accelerated services don't pay extra. This is the same in every public school in IL -- schools cannot legally charge students for services they receive during the school day & as part of instruction. Student fees can be charged for materials and for programs offered before or after school day. District 39 can and does charge parents fees for materials and for programs offered before and after school. As for special ed services, public schools are required by law to provide students with disabilities an education in the least restrictive environment, and those students' educational plan must be individualized to meet their needs, and developed with parental involvement. This supports and encourages better educational outcomes, preparation of students for employment and/or higher education, as well as independent living, all of which serves the community and country as a whole. Congress has found that integrated education produces better outcomes if placements in regular classrooms include needed supports and accommodations.

Get informed. There is a community presentation on Tue, March 22 at 7:00 at the Rec Center. There are also open houses and coffees around you if you ask or call around. At these meetings, can ask questions and get answers. Lots of information also at www.supportwilmetteschools.com.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

12:01 pm on Friday, March 11, 2011

WilmetteCivility:

I agree with you, Superintendent Lechner is probably the most knowledgeable special education professional-administrator in Illinois and previous superintendents and boards have left him with a huge challenge--and until the Economic -real estate crisis of 2008, money gushed into the district which enabled the small class sizes that enable the full inclusion model. But, by Junior high school ability grouping is critical. Research demonstrates that high ability--highly motivated kids can flourish in large classes, provided the curriculum is geared to their ability. Fully included special education costs more because it requires smaller class sizes, more teachers, more space etc. NSSED costs have been historically hard to control. But there are also many situations when parents prefer special placements. And Lechner has, with his knowledge and professionalism has prevented special education litigation which was rampant during the 90's. The other huge assumption of this full inclusion model is that the state of IL will reimburse the district $9,000 per Spec Ed teacher and a premium for each child classified--but the state of IL owes schools, hospitals, doctors and hundreds of other vendors millions of dollars. Bottom line, it just seems one sided to me, that one interest group-- parents--special or regular, should be demanding a referendum before another interest group--the teachers accept any concessions. Everything should be on the table.

Margaret Mcintyre

9:22 am on Friday, March 11, 2011

As a board member, I advocated that every child have an individual plan, similar to how Montessori schools use "contracts of learning". During the early 90's
"gifted" or accelerated programs were eliminated and the focus of resources were shifted to special education. In accordance with the research on special education children, regular education children became a useful part of the special education child's therapy. In contrast, it was assumed that if parents wanted the needs of their accelerated child met beyond what was offered in the regular included classroom, parents would take responsibility and find it outside the classroom and pay for it themselves--thus the rise of KUMON math, Huntington Learning Systems (which also helps special needs children), Northwestern Program for Gifted, and Johns Hopkins (on-line) accelerated programs. The concept of differentiated education was offered to satisfy parents who sought curriculum that was more challenging. In theory, the curriculum differentiation approach spans the range of abilities, learning styles, special talents and interests. In reality, well behaved go along regular and gifted kids were often paired or grouped with children considered special needs which contradicted much of the research which suggests that gifted children learn best when they are grouped with similar peers. http://www.nagc.org/commonmyths.aspx

Reply

WilmetteCares

10:30 am on Friday, March 11, 2011

D39 is fiscally & educationally responsible. Facts don't support attacks on special ed, or claims that outsourcing would be better. Consider:
(1) REVENUE: D39 gets Fed & State funds for special ed. If outsourced, that's lost revenue.
(2) IEPs: Early & effective intervention has led to fewer IEPs. In fact, D39 just cut $1M in special ed due to declining caseloads. Claim that D39's programs attract undesirable kids are factually inaccurate & morally repugnant. Test scores are high; IEPs are down.
(3) PRESENT DAY CHARGES: NSSED's salary schedule outpaces that of D39. Also, NSSED just had a $16M+ building expense paid by member districts. D39's share would be large. Imagine high NSSED fees in 2011, plus lost special ed revenue. Note: Lake Forest/Lake Bluff just filed notice to pull out of NSSED based on efficiencies.
(4) OVERALL: Across U.S., expenses have gone up for regular & special ed commensurate with rising labor costs. Looking at special ed in a vacuum does not make sense.
(5) BENEFIT: The value of having nearly all D39 kids in Wilmette schools is immeasurable. Kids in functional academics go to school w/neighbors & sibs (not miles away) & all students enjoy inclusive education. This strengthens community. Services like speech are integrated into school day. For services provided in-class, the presence of an extra teacher benefits ALL kids.

Alarmist claims lack merit. All kids deserve excellent & effective education. D39 provides that with major efficiencies to boot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

10:59 am on Friday, March 11, 2011

Denise Kellar
11:10am on Monday, March 7, 2011
I am a Realtor, and a parent of a Special Education graduate of Wilmette schools as well as New Trier.
First, the 25-30% downturn in home values is due to the economy, not due to one community vs. another or one tax structure vs. another.
Second, Special Education: We moved to Wilmette for the Special Education services. We checked out the surrounding communities, Glenview, Northbrook and made phone calls to Winnetka and Kenilworth. Wilmette was head and shoulders above the others! Without question. If the options were just NSSED, I probably would have not been as happy. Nothing against NSSED/NSSRA. It's an option. As a parent of the "Graduate" Special Olympics Program with a 29 year-old child still participating, thanks to a really great caring, Lew Goldstein, I have seen tremendous strides in my adult child, and all of her fellow Olympians. It's simply amazing to have witnessed this growth. Thanks to Wilmette District 39 and New Trier. I'm sure many people would share this opinion with me. I sell these communities based on "schools"--that's the reason we're all here, usually. Our schools are vital and contribute a lot to what drives our real estate market.
Winnetka passed a huge referendum within the last 10 years to update the crumbling infrastructure of all their schools; a bitter pill to swallow vs. what Wilmette is facing now.

Margaret Mcintyre

10:55 am on Friday, March 11, 2011

Kimbra, this is genuinely good news that curriculum differentiation is working for your kids--especially in math (as well as reading?). It was also our experience that the teachers at McKenzie did an amazing job. I have unqualified praise for the McKenzie teachers my children had. They invented many work-a-rounds for the various fuzzy math curriculums. I did spend quite a bit of money on KUMON and Huntington for math however because by oldest was part of the Trailblazers experiment (pilot years) and my youngest child was part of the University of Chicago Experiment (first three years). I also supplemented with Singpore math because we found the Highcrest math program wholly inadequate for all ability levels; we were rewarded when so much of Singapore math appeared on the SAT math --and the kids did very well. Sounds like after 12 years, the district has perfected the math curriculum.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Walter

7:13 pm on Saturday, March 26, 2011

Hey Margaret, I think that a gifted differentiation program, especially one that is producing "genuinely good news," is worth keeping. The problem is, if the referendum fails to pass, the curriculum differentiation gets the ax. And those amazing teachers? They get cut, too.

From the District 39 Referendum Fact Sheet:

If the referendum fails, class size guidelines will increase to between 26 and 33 students per class (depending on grade), and over the next two years the District will cut:
24% of the teachers -- 80 of 328
ALL foreign language (K-8), instrumental music (5-8), reading intervention
ALL librarians, technology teachers & differentiation/gifted specialists
Time K-4 children spend in music, art and PE by 30-50%

These are things worth keeping. These are things of which we can be proud to provide to our neighbors and their kids.

Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

2:48 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Walter, the gifted program was eliminated when my first child entered second grade--in favor of "differentiation". The problem is full inclusion trying to provide 'gifted differentiation" in the same classroom as everything else-can't call it gifted education. Most research shows that gifted, mature and motivated kids can be taught in larger classes of similar ability students. Such grouping would save the District money--instead, the "faith in" full inclusion prevails. I paid for gifted education for my kids out of my own pocket all the years my kids were in D39--it was the least I could do since the rest of the school benefit was paid for by my neighbor's taxes. What was good enough for my kids is good enough for the kids in d39 today. There is simply no justification for "full inclusion" models that require so many extra personnel in each classroom. What about the 10-13 "behavioral specialists" in the district? A school psychologist for each building? How many social workers, occupational therapists--none of these are related to instrumental music, art or PE (except for the special ed PE teacher). A 50% reduction in ART, PE or Instrumental music would not be a hardship for children in Wilmette considering the plethora of Art, music and PE opportunities available through the park district at a less expensive rate. There is so much duplication of services between the schools and the park district, school has become like camp!
Fee for extra services seems fair.

Concerned Parent

8:41 am on Sunday, March 13, 2011

I am a parent of a special needs child who is heavily involved with our district. I have a typical functioning child too. We were in the state funded Early Intervention program and our daughter is currently in the Connecting Kids (district 39) preschool program. Early intervention is KEY to not ONLY the success of the child's overall development and also the overall costs in terms of services. It is true that these interventions are working and we as a district are indeed doing reductions because of these interventions - this IS good news. I am a room parent who has a paraprofessional in my other child’s 1st grade classroom. I have observed first hand how this individual helps ALL the children while helping the teacher too. Full inclusion works. Children learn from one another and more importantly RESPECT one another in this environment. Children with special needs historically were hidden away, thrown in institutions until 1970’s - thankfully this doesn't happen anymore. I cannot even imagine doing this to my child – no parent could. My daughter has done so much better in a loving environment with people who CARE and a district that CARES. My daughter isn't a number or a diagnosis she's a human being a person with feelings and a heart. Wilmette Civility you're right on with this discussion - thank you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

3:01 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Concerned Parent, in the neighborhood I grew up in, people did not 'throw their children" into institutions. You're right, when regular, special and more advanced children are raised together, an amazing socialization and acceptance occurs. And there is a huge spectrum of "disabilities". But the Connecting Kids does not pay for itself, it is subsidized by the taxpayers and has added some 24 personnel to the roles. If you can afford to live in Wilmette, you can afford to pay more for special services--unless you are a renter--and that raises all kinds of resentments and equity issues. My family also has 'special education" children in it as I come from a huge extended family--and no one would suggest putting all the kids in the same academic environment. All kids are not better off in a fully included environment. However, no one is suggesting locking children away--that's the bias of a status obsessed outlook that can't accept limitations. When I was on the board, I advocated for children (whose parents asked for my assistance) for private placements in special schools designed for the needs of that student. It seemed to be a kinder solution. In the end though, I believe parents should have both choices and pay a larger share of special education--especially if they can afford to live in Wilmette.

Concerned Parent

8:55 am on Sunday, March 13, 2011

I encourage all of us to rent the movie Race To Nowhere and be reminded the importance of a good education and more importantly an educator. If you don't like what you see the write your state official. It can take a village and we all obviously care about our children's and grand children's future.

Reply

Dan

12:16 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

Concerned Parent, Giving school more and more money simply does not translate into better education. The school district wasted a lot of money to pay for non-teaching administrators. There are THREE assistant superintendents in the district on top of the five principals. Everyone of them makes $200,000. Cut one of the them you will have enough money to support both the music and foreign language class. You can check out the school's salary at http://www.familytaxpayers.org. Maybe we should out source our administrating jobs to Massachusette, where there are better schools and superintendents make far less than IL.

Reply

Max

6:20 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

Vote No to this Tax Increase Referendum.

D39 needs to live within the means, EVERYBODY ELSE DOES !

VOTE NO.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol Bennett

7:43 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011

MAX IS AN IMPOSTER.

HE DOES NOT LIVE IN DISTRICT 39. HE DOES NOT LIVE IN WILMETTE.

MAX IS AN IDEALOGICAL ZEALOT THAT IS TRYING TO PUSH HIS POLITICS INTO OUR COMMUNITY.

MAX HAS NO CREDIBILITY IN THIS DISCUSSION.

Ken

10:26 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Margaret,

Look, enough about the teachers' unions already. It's a red herring.

I happen to agree with some of the opponents' views in that area (though I think it's important to distinguish between the teachers' unions and the teachers themselves). The teachers' unions nationwide have been insufficiently flexible in a number of areas. But the teachers' contract is not on the ballot, period. That will have to be dealt with separately, whether that is persuading them to renegotiate now or we negotiate a better contract when it's up. If you think that rejecting the referendum and manufacturing some kind of fiscal crisis is a good strategy to force new contract talks, that's insane. As even your fellow opponents have noted, a complete salary freeze would still only address one third of the current deficit. That kind of brinksmanship makes no sense, and the idea that we should do that at risk to our children's education is horrible. You are entitled to your opinions, even though you don't live here anymore, but I do find it hard to swallow that you are suggesting we take risks that your children wouldn't be subject to.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

12:47 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Ken, FYI. My children all had the same wonderful fourth grade teacher who was president of the WEA--and we loved her; she was the best president the WEA ever had, smart, fair, realistic. Her name is not on the contracts. Don't tell me how to distinguish between 'the teachers" and "the WEA" or the WEA and the NEA. The WEA and the NEA are 100% political organizations that reward raw power and money seeking--and punish fair and balanced labor relations. When you 1. are elected to the school board as the top vote getter, 2. have the best president of the WEA as your own children's teacher (three times), and experience teaching a large sample of these children in grades 1-7 as I did while a religious education teacher ( a good sample of behavior--not necessarily the same as full time classroom teacher), then you will have credibility. I am informed, experienced and now have the objectivity of having my children in a public school system outside of IL; an excellent public school WITHOUT the influence of the NEA, a school which provides my accelerated children with a bounty of advanced opportunities, and also provides parents with significant choice in school attendance through school specialization. I paid taxes in Wilmette for 28 years so I paid for a piece of the Highcrest addition, the McKenzie addition, the WJHS remodeling and ceiling acoustics and many more benefits your children are enjoying today! A referendum is NOT justified to maintain the status quo!

Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

1:18 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

ken, and one more thing. The Wilmette community, by its support of overly generous teacher and administrator pay--which results in ever more generous retirement benefits which further burdens the less affluent private sector union members--the Wilmette community will accelerate the loss of private sector jobs in Illinois. Public debt chases employers out of IL.
http://chicagobreakingbusiness.com/2011/03/caterpillar-threatens-to-leave-illinois-over-taxes.html
Wilmette children are not being 'sacrificed". My children sure were not "sacrificed" when they attended Wilmette schools with 100+ fewer teachers! It's immoral that the administration persists in casting this financial conundrum as a "choice" between "gutting services" or raising property taxes while home prices continue to fall.

O

4:26 pm on Saturday, March 26, 2011

I will offer a solution.

For all of you that are in favor of this referendum, do the math and figure out how much your taxes will go up. Next grab your checkbook and make a tax-deductible contribution to the District 39 foundation in that amount.
http://216.45.200.1/d39foundation/make-a-secure-online-donation.html
Make it for more if you wish.
Remember to do this every year.
All of these funds will then be put toward keeping many of the programs funded that you don't want cut. It will also keep us in a favorable position to negotiate the next teachers contract.

I think everyone is in favor of great schools. I know that my family has worked hard and in may ways for the school, and continues to do so. We have to many personnel and with 6 figure librarian salaries, we need to make changes to the employment contract. The way to do that is through strength.

Reply

Max

4:52 pm on Saturday, March 26, 2011

Margaret Mcintyre wrote on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 :
Source : http://wilmette.patch.com/articles/wilmette-parent-vote-yes-for-district-39-referendum
.
"Top-paid New Trier Township educators in retirement Former Superintendent Henry Bangser was rewarded by the New Trier District 203 School Board with a series of 20 percent pay raises in the years preceding his 2006 retirement at age 57. Those pay boosts pushed his final salary up to $364,500.
.
As a result, Bangser now draws an annual pension of more than $230,000, which makes him the sixth best-paid pensioner in the Teachers' Retirement System."
.
Who do we know gets an annual pension of more than $230,000 ? ANNUAL PENSION, NOT PAY !
Who do we know that can retire at age 57 ? AGE 57, NOT 65 or 66!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol Bennett

7:43 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011

MAX IS AN IMPOSTER.

HE DOES NOT LIVE IN DISTRICT 39. HE DOES NOT LIVE IN WILMETTE.

MAX IS AN IDEALOGICAL ZEALOT THAT IS TRYING TO PUSH HIS POLITICS INTO OUR COMMUNITY.

MAX HAS NO CREDIBILITY IN THIS DISCUSSION.

Margaret Mcintyre

12:27 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Ken, every taxpayer is entitled to propose solutions to the public sector budget
Crisis upon us at every level-- national, state and local. Somehow, an attitude of “insulation” has developed there in Wilmette as if Wilmette schools have had no hand in the cause of the crisis or are above making changes to ameliorate the fiscal crisis abetted by such outlandish contracts as the WEA 2008. I still have friends and family in Wilmette and IL who cannot afford to finance lavish pay and benefits for an expanding public workforce. I don’t agree that solutions should or must be born by the children. My children flourished in D39 on 2000 budgets which could reasonably be increased by CPI. I paid for “gifted” education at KUMON, Huntington and Northwestern Center for Talent Development. Today’s parents can do the same.
Worse, today’s “all inclusion” classroom model necessitates more teachers per classroom instead of grouping the top 25% of students into larger class sizes and grouping the other 75% in smaller classes. With ability/motivational/behavioral grouping, fewer teachers are needed and all student needs are met.
Solutions are possible if only there was motivation to cooperate and innovate with a smaller budget, rather than employ brinksmanship tactics that prey on the emotions of parents. Shameful. That some realtors seek special ed families as buyers to pay a premium for Wilmette homes that entitles them to services of greater value— is immoral.

Reply

Margaret Mcintyre

3:30 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

There is an amazingly rich spectrum of pre-school, music, art, drama and technology offered by the Wilmette Park District, provided by non-union staff (many with same degrees as D39 teachers)-and yes, there are fees and there is choice. Still, Wilmette property owners pay to maintain the Park District, therefore subsidize these offerings. Back when my kids first started to enjoy the park district, the booklet of offerings was 25 pages--today, it is 96 pages long--not a criticism, just an observation. I have said this more than once, I feel our family benefited as much from the Park District as the Schools, with the added benefit of up front legitimate choices which amounted to a customized curriculum of enrichment. Whether is was soccer, gymnastics, gym and art, day camp, pre-school, ceramics, sailing, water sports, sports camp, ballet /tap /dance lessons, ice skating, the Wallace Bowl or Centennial Water Park ( paid for with referendum), with swim lessons, diving lessons, --the enrichments are unmatched on the North Shore. Even Winnetka residents use Wilmette's facilities for a small additional user fee. No child in Wilmette will be deprived if Art, Music or PE is reduced during the school day!

Reply

Max

4:27 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Daphne wrote : (seems like Dapne's post may have been deleted.) Below is a partial quote :
.
""Living within our means" as Max suggests would result in a notably inferior school system...."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Feel free to donate to the District 39 Educational Foundation as much as you desire.
.
http://216.45.200.1/d39foundation/make-a-secure-online-donation.html
.
I have lived in Wilmette for over a quarter of a century now. I was happy with the schools my kids attended. I am also happy to pay for that same level of programs and services that my kids enjoyed. Just don't ask me to support additional programs or services.
.
If going back to the services we can afford means going back to an "inferior school system", so be it. My kids did just fine with that "inferior school system", I am sure your kids will do just fine with that too. However, should you feel unsure, feel free to get those programs and services privately, at your own expense.
.
I would like to maintain the quality of life and standard of living I enjoy in Wilmette and will continue to support your kids in school as long as I can afford to.
.
To ensure that,
.
Vote NO because you care.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol Bennett

7:43 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011

MAX IS AN IMPOSTER.

HE DOES NOT LIVE IN DISTRICT 39. HE DOES NOT LIVE IN WILMETTE.

MAX IS AN IDEALOGICAL ZEALOT THAT IS TRYING TO PUSH HIS POLITICS INTO OUR COMMUNITY.

MAX HAS NO CREDIBILITY IN THIS DISCUSSION.

O

5:06 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

By golly Max I think you hit the nail squarely on the head. Congratulations!

Reply

Margaret Mcintyre

5:20 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Max, Daphne's comment resonates with what most of the parents thought of the Wilmette schools when I was serving on the Board.
We certainly didn't think we had inferior schools then, or substandard schools, or schools that such a huge infusion of money! amen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Walter

7:48 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Once again, from the District 39 Referendum Fact Sheet:

If the referendum fails, class size guidelines will increase to between 26 and 33 students per class (depending on grade), and over the next two years the District will cut:
--24% of the teachers -- 80 of 328
--ALL foreign language (K-8), instrumental music (5-8), reading intervention
--ALL librarians, technology teachers & differentiation/gifted specialists
--Time K-4 children spend in music, art and PE by 30-50%

It matters not how a District 39 without librarians, differentiation/gifted specialists, music or foreign language would compare to the schools of your memory. What matters is that if the referendum fails, the District 39 of 2012 and beyond will be inferior to the District 39 of 2010. Vote YES to keep our schools just the way they are.

Max

5:47 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Margaret Mcintyre,
.
Your opinion, sense of history, insight, knowledege and experience, knowing that you had lived in Wilmette longer than I have to date, is an inspiration and invaluable to me and hope, to many residents here.
.
I wish I had the time and the energy to have been more involved in local Village and School District matters when my kids were in school, but hope I have the chance to interact more in future, hopefully, more objectively, since I don't have kids in school.
.
So, please ignore the people who go attacking your character or personality. Don't let them stop you from expressing your opinion and offering us your insight about your former place of residence.
.
Thank you, sincerely,

Max

Reply
Comment_arrow

Margaret Mcintyre

9:56 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

Thanks Max. I also had the benefit of learning from the personal attacks, although, most of the nastiest ones were anonymous (most likely folks who didn't vote for me). It's hard to move and just forget about the prior good life and how much emotion and effort I poured into the school system--for all kids. Many fine teachers. Many very very intelligent parents who provided information, research, analysis, insight and friendship. If information and history can give some perspective to current parents and voters, hopefully reason and creativity will kick in and solutions will be found.

Comment_arrow

Carol Bennett

7:43 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011

MAX IS AN IMPOSTER.

HE DOES NOT LIVE IN DISTRICT 39. HE DOES NOT LIVE IN WILMETTE.

MAX IS AN IDEALOGICAL ZEALOT THAT IS TRYING TO PUSH HIS POLITICS INTO OUR COMMUNITY.

MAX HAS NO CREDIBILITY IN THIS DISCUSSION.

O

7:55 pm on Sunday, March 27, 2011

I will offer a different solution.
For all of you that are in favor of this referendum, do the math and figure out how much your taxes will go up. Next make a tax-deductible contribution to the District 39 foundation in that amount.
http://216.45.200.1/d39foundation/make-a-secure-online-donation.html
Make it for more if you like.
Remember to do it this year and every year.
All of these funds will then be put toward keeping many of the programs funded that you don't want cut.
I think everyone is in favor of great schools. I know that my family has worked in may ways for the school district, and continues to do so.
For the record the District 39 Educational Foundation is an independent volunteer group. It is not related to the school board. It operates independently. It does spend all of its funds for project related to District 39 school students, staff and community.

Reply

Greenwood

9:31 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011

I've researched the available information and was tending toward voting in favor of the referendum until I read posts like the caps-lock "IDEOLOGICAL ZEALOT" tirade and conspiracy theories about Margaret's one-woman campaign to drive down real estate values in the village. Ad hominem attacks don't help the pro-referendum cause, and in my view undercut the credibility of all referendum supporters. Thanks for making the decision easier.

Reply

J.M.

9:28 pm on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Margaret - Those of us who actually live in Wilmette NOW have voted, and voted FOR our schools. Please feel free to go back to your life in VIRGINIA and give us all a rest from your opinions. Thank you.

Reply

Leave a comment