In 1990, Nancy Bishop Langert, who was three months pregnant, was shot to death along with her husband, Richard Langert, in their Winnetka townhome. Twenty-two years later, her legacy continues to inspire others — demonstrated by the fact that she used her last few minutes of life to spell out one last message of love.
“She dragged herself to her husband and drew a heart and ‘U’ in her own blood,” Jennifer Bishop-Jenkins, Nancy’s sister, explained at a New Trier Democrats panel on gun control held Sunday.
The Langerts had been shot with a .357 Magnum in the basement of their Winnetka home by David Biro, a New Trier High School senior, according to an April 9, 1992 Chicago Reader article. Biro, who was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, never gave a clear reason for why he killed the Langerts.
However, the Reader article states, Biro was “notorious within the police department,” and in the past had attempted to poison the milk in his family’s refrigerator, shot a 7 year old with a BB gun, set another child’s clothing on fire and fired a BB gun at a woman in a car, shattering her windows.
Bishop-Jenkins, a former high school teacher, has actively sought to end gun violence since her sister’s murder. She has served on the board of the Illinois Coalition Against the Death Penalty, as the state president for the Million Moms March/Brady Campaign and is a volunteer with the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence.
“That event changed my life,” Bishop-Jenkins said about the murders. “That event helped me to understand that there are so many people that have suffered because of gun violence.”
Her dedication to preventing other families from having to experience what she went through, as well as the countless hours that she’s spent counseling families of murder victims, made her especially upset by the Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) email sent out to get pro-gun advocates to attend the New Trier Democrat’s panel.
In the email, Bishop-Jenkins — as well as the other panelists — are described as “the people who don’t care if you or your family members are raped, robbed and murdered by violent criminals. They only care about one thing — disarming you.”
“There are no words,” Bishop-Jenkins said of the email, as she choked back her tears. “I’ve spent the last 22 years working every day with the victims of violent crime. This is a horrible thing to say.”
She continued, noting that the line in the email about wanting to disarm gun owners wasn’t true.
“Disarming you — that’s not true,” she said. “We do not support bans. We only support three things — uniformed background checks, no military-style assault weapons in the hands of citizens and regulating the traffic of guns.”
“You cannot address the problem of guns with more guns,” she continued. “We have to prevent guns from getting into the wrong hands. It’s not a threat to their interpretation of the second amendment. … They’re paranoid.”
The New Trier Democrats panel on gun control was delivered to a lively audience, made up largely of pro-gun advocates. You can read more about the event here and about the Illinois State Rifle Association's plan to pack the audience here and here.
I am so sorry for your loss, and I thank you for your work toward a more responsible gun culture in this country. There was another shooting at a college in Texas today. I can't help but wonder where and when the next tragedy will take place - because this is just going to continue until we do exactly what you are working toward: uniformed background checks, no military-style assault weapons in the hands of citizens and regulating the traffic of guns. Thank you for doing what you do - you give from the motivation of your own personal tragedy, and you are undoubtedly attacked every time you speak (or write). I see this type of irrational response everywhere. One cannot speak about wanting an open, honest conversation about guns in this country without being told accused of wanting to abolish the 2nd amendment. This is simply not true. Nowhere have I seen anyone talk about doing away with the 2nd amendment. I just don't want my child, or brother, or husband, to be next. There has got to be a middle ground here. By the way, I went to the forum on Sunday but was turned away at the door.
So I'll go back to part of the ruling in the DC versus Heller case that you clearly don't understand. It states "Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose" That is the issue, Dan. Keep your little toy gun- I don't care. But there is no reason to own weapons that are meant to be used by the military or law enforcement.
Thanks and sorry to those who came and could not get in. We will have this discussion. And without the disruptive bullies from outside our community who DID act inappropriately at times (denouncing one of the speakers as "Jewish" and many shouts of veiled threats such as "you don't know which one of us are carrying - many of us in this room ARE armed - you will not know who").
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/shooting-texas-college-campus-reports-191439016.html
JBJ, so sorry about what happened to your sister. What an awful tragedy.
Here's some reading material for you. http://www.startribune.com/local/west/187610601.html?refer=y